Cited by 45Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical and numerical algorithmsStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Robustness to nonnormality of regression F-tests

Ali, Mukhtar M., Sharma, Subhash C.·1996·Journal of Econometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01700-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gaussian models are robust as long as there are no outliers that occur in X and Y simultaneously.

    “leading to the conclusion that Gaussian models are robust as long as there are no outliers that occur in X and Y simultaneously.”

    From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996

  • When the predictor variable X contains a single outlier that coincides with an outlier in Y, it creates an extreme observation with high leverage on the regression line.

    “Specifically, when the predictor variable X contains a single outlier, then it is possible that the case coincides with an outlier in Y, creating an extreme observation with high leverage on the regression line.”

    From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996

  • With large sample sizes ≥ 500, the Central Limit Theorem guarantees that regression coefficients are on average normally distributed.

    “With large sample sizes ≥ 500 the Central Limit Theorem guarantees that the regression coefficients are on average normally distributed (Ali & Sharma, 1996; Lumley et al., 2002).”

    From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996

  • Linear models are typically said to be robust to violation of the normality assumption for hypothesis testing and parameter estimation as long as outliers are handled properly.

    “Throughout the scientific literature, linear models are typically said to be robust to the violation of the normality assumption when it comes to hypothesis testing and parameter estimation as long as outliers are handled properly (Ali & Sharma, 1996; Box & Watson, 1962; Gelman & Hill, 2007; Lumley et al., 2002; Miller, 1986; Puth et al., 2014; Ramsey & Schafer, 2013; Schielzeth et al., 2020; W”

    From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996

  • Statistical significance gets seriously misestimated based on the assumption of Gaussian errors in Y only when an outlier in Y coincides with an outlier in X.

    “This is the only case where statistical significance gets seriously misestimated based on the assumption of Gaussian errors in Y which is violated by the outlier in Y.”

    From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 45

Authors
Ali, M. M., & Sharma, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Ali, Mukhtar M.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-03
Volume
71
Issue
1-2
Pages
175-205
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027707491
Cited by
45
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
robustness to non-normality, F-test, linear regression, null distribution, non-normal errors, influential observations, finite moments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review