Robustness to nonnormality of regression F-tests
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gaussian models are robust as long as there are no outliers that occur in X and Y simultaneously.
“leading to the conclusion that Gaussian models are robust as long as there are no outliers that occur in X and Y simultaneously.”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996
When the predictor variable X contains a single outlier that coincides with an outlier in Y, it creates an extreme observation with high leverage on the regression line.
“Specifically, when the predictor variable X contains a single outlier, then it is possible that the case coincides with an outlier in Y, creating an extreme observation with high leverage on the regression line.”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996
With large sample sizes ≥ 500, the Central Limit Theorem guarantees that regression coefficients are on average normally distributed.
“With large sample sizes ≥ 500 the Central Limit Theorem guarantees that the regression coefficients are on average normally distributed (Ali & Sharma, 1996; Lumley et al., 2002).”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996
Linear models are typically said to be robust to violation of the normality assumption for hypothesis testing and parameter estimation as long as outliers are handled properly.
“Throughout the scientific literature, linear models are typically said to be robust to the violation of the normality assumption when it comes to hypothesis testing and parameter estimation as long as outliers are handled properly (Ali & Sharma, 1996; Box & Watson, 1962; Gelman & Hill, 2007; Lumley et al., 2002; Miller, 1986; Puth et al., 2014; Ramsey & Schafer, 2013; Schielzeth et al., 2020; W”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996
Statistical significance gets seriously misestimated based on the assumption of Gaussian errors in Y only when an outlier in Y coincides with an outlier in X.
“This is the only case where statistical significance gets seriously misestimated based on the assumption of Gaussian errors in Y which is violated by the outlier in Y.”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ali & Sharma, 1996
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Ali, M. M., & Sharma, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ali, Mukhtar M.
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 175-205
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027707491
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- robustness to non-normality, F-test, linear regression, null distribution, non-normal errors, influential observations, finite moments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review