Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inhibition of hepatocytic protein degradation by methylaminopurines and inhibitors of protein synthesis

KOVACS, A, SEGLEN, P·1981·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

Abstract

Nutritional control of protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes can take place in the absence of protein synthesis. Suppression of degradation by amino acids (step-up) is unaffected and the enhanced degradation seen upon amino acid deprivation (step-down) is only partially inhibited by cycloheximide at a concentration (10(-3) M) which inhibits protein synthesis virtually completely. Protein degradation per se is, however, inhibited by cycloheximide as well as by puromycin, apparently at least in part by mechanisms additional or unrelated to their effect on protein synthesis. Several puromycin analogues (methylaminopurines) are stronger inhibitors of protein degradation than of protein synthesis, most notably puromycin aminonucleoside and 6-dimethylaminopurine riboside (N6,N6-dimethyladenosine). The latter compounds appear to specifically inhibit cellular autophagy, since neither the degradation of endocytosed protein (asialofetuin) nor the extralysosomal (amino acid-, propylamine- and leupeptin-resistant) degradation are affected.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-4165(81)90189-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
KOVACS, A., & SEGLEN, P.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-08-17
Volume
676
Issue
2
Pages
213-220
ISSN
0304-4165
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review