The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by hydrous Fe(III) oxides in seawater
Open accessAbstract
The rate of oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by hydrous Fe(III) oxides has been determined as a function of pH (4.0–8.5), temperature (5–45 °C) and ionic strength (0–4 m) in seawater. The effect of the major ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42−, B(OH)4− and HCO4−), minor solutes (PO43−, Si(OH)4, NH4+ and Mn2+) and some organic ligands (EDTA, Tris, oxalate, humic acid and fulvic acid) on the rates of oxidation was examined. The overall rate constant, k, is first order with respect to both hydrogen sulfide and hydrous Fe(III) oxides: −d[H2S]Tdt = k[H2S]T [Fe(OH)3(s)] The rate constant, k, for seawater (S = 36, pH = 8.0) at 25 °C is 1.48 × 102 M−1 min−1 or 0.0138 m−2 1 min−1 when [Fe(OH)3(s)] is expressed in surface area (m21). The apparent activation energy was found to be 4.5 ± 0.2 kJ mol−1. The oxidation rate is strongly dependent on pH with a maximum near 6.5. The pH dependence of the oxidation rate can be adequately described by the reaction pathways including the formation of surface complexes between sulfide species and surface sites of Fe(OH)3(s), followed by electron transfer. The major divalent ions (SO42−, Mg2+ and Ca2+) decrease the reaction rate with the effect of SO42− being greater than Mg2+ and Ca2+. Phosphate and silicate inhibit the reaction significantly due to the adsorption on the particle surface. The reactivity of Fe(OH)3(s) is highly dependent on the condition of its formation. Some organic ligands such as EDTA and Tris can enhance the Fe(II)–Fe(III) redox cycle. The dominant product from the oxidation of H2S by Fe(OH)3(s) is elemental sulfur (S °).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jacobs, L., Emerson, S., & Skei, J. (1985) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(85)90293-5 · Cited by 296
Cited by
The interplay of microbially mediated and abiotic reactions in the biogeochemical Fe cycle
Melton, E. D., Swanner, E. D., Behrens, S., Schmidt, C., & Kappler, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3347 · Cited by 899
The Biogeochemical Sulfur Cycle of Marine Sediments
Jørgensen, B. B., Findlay, A. J., & Pellerin, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00849 · Cited by 784
Elemental proxies for paleosalinity analysis of ancient shales and mudrocks
Wei, W., & Algeo, T. J. (2020) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2019.06.034 · Cited by 677
A revised scheme for the reactivity of iron (oxyhydr)oxide minerals towards dissolved sulfide
Poulton, S. W., Krom, M. D., & Raiswell, R. (2004) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.012 · Cited by 667
Bacterial Manganese and Iron Reduction in Aquatic Sediments
Thamdrup, B. (2000) · Advances in Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4187-5_2 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, W., & Millero, F. J.
- Venue
- Marine Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0304-4203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062241188
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by hydrous Fe(III) oxides in seawater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00072-0
- The paper
- Yao, W., & Millero, F. J. (1996). Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by hydrous Fe(III) oxides in seawater. Marine Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00072-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.