In vitro propagation of some olive (Olea europaea sativa L.) cultivars with different root-ability, and medium development using analytical data from developing shoots and embryos
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different fundamental formulations are required for olive genotypes.
“Different fundamental formulations are required for olive genotypes [10, 15]”
Apical dominance and oxidized tannins from phenolic compounds in semi-solid media inhibit normal regeneration in olive.
“Apical dominance and oxidized tannins from phenolic compounds in semi-solid media inhibited the normal regeneration in olive [9, 10].”
In vitro culture of olive has a genotype-dependent low micropropagation rate that needs improvement in established and newly released cultivars.
“In vitro culture of olive, as an economically valuable tree, has fundamentally a genotype-dependant low micropropagation rate which needs to be improved in already established and newly released cultivars.”
Callus formation is mainly dependent on cultivars, media and PGRs.
“Callus formation is mainly dependent on cultivars, media and PGRs [9, 10, 21].”
OM is the best medium for olive micropropagation, high in Ca, Mg, S, Cu and Zn.
“Analysis of olive shoot tip (4–5 cm) by Rugini [10] resulted in introducing the best medium for olive micropropagation called OM which is high in Ca, Mg, S, Cu and Zn elements.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Somaclonal Variation in Tissue Culture: A Case Study with Olive
Leva, A. R., Petruccelli, R., & Rinaldi, L. M. R. (2012) · Recent Advances in Plant in vitro Culture · doi:10.5772/50367 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Nano-silver particles eliminate the in vitro contaminations of Olive ‘Mission’ explants
Rostami, A. A., & Shahsavar, A. (2009) · Asian Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.3923/ajps.2009.505.509 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Mirzaei, L., Yadollahi, A., Kermani, M. J., Naderpour, M., Zeinanloo, A. A., Farsi, M., & Davoodi, D. (2021) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-021-00724-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Plant Tissue Culture Technology: Present and Future Development
Yancheva, S., & Kondakova, V. (2018) · Reference Series in Phytochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54600-1_16 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rugini, E.
- Corresponding author
- Rugini, E.
- ORCID
- Rugini, E.
- Venue
- Scientia Horticulturae
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-134
- ISSN
- 0304-4238 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990447491
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scientia Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Keywords
- olive, Olea europaea, micropropagation, shoot multiplication, culture medium formulation, mineral content, reduced glutathione, shoot rooting, juvenile shoots, hardening off, gibberellic acid, almond, Frantoio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review