Cited by 294Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

In vitro propagation of some olive (Olea europaea sativa L.) cultivars with different root-ability, and medium development using analytical data from developing shoots and embryos

Rugini, E.·1984·Scientia Horticulturae

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-4238(84)90143-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rugini, E.
Corresponding author
Rugini, E.
Venue
Scientia Horticulturae
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-11
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
123-134
ISSN
0304-4238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990447491
Cited by
294
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientia Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
olive, Olea europaea, micropropagation, shoot multiplication, culture medium formulation, mineral content, reduced glutathione, shoot rooting, juvenile shoots, hardening off, gibberellic acid, almond, Frantoio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review