Neurons with access to the general circulation in the central nervous system of the rat: a retrograde tracing study with Fluoro-Gold
Abstract
Central nervous system neurons which have access to the general circulation were identified by injecting the retrograde tracer Fluoro-Gold peripherally. Fluoro-Gold does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier but is taken up by nerve terminals which project to areas supplied by fenestrated capillaries or to the periphery. Fluoro-Gold-accumulating neurons were present in the following regions or cell groups of the central nervous system: diagonal band of Broca; medial preoptic area; organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis; subfornical organ; anterior periventricular area; paraventricular nucleus; arcuate nucleus; accessory magnocellular nuclei of the hypothalamus; motor neurons of cranial nerves III-VII, and IX-XII in the brainstem and spinal cord; autonomic ganglionic cells of cranial nerve III (Westphal-Edinger nucleus) in the mesencephalon and the intermediolateral column of the spinal cord; sensory ganglia of the cranial nerve V (mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus); and the C1-C2 and A2 adrenergic cell groups in the medulla. In addition, Fluoro-Gold-accumulating neurons were seen in the sensory ganglia of cranial and spinal nerves. Retrograde labeling with Fluoro-Gold can be combined with immunocytochemistry to identify the chemical messengers within Fluoro-Gold-labeled perikarya. Although a large number of neurons are labeled in the central nervous system with Fluoro-Gold when it is administered peripherally, this technique in combination with immunocytochemistry can be a powerful tool to identify selected neuronal systems in the central nervous system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intravenous injections of the BBB impermeable retrograde tracer FluoroGold into the lateral tail vein enable selective labeling of magnocellular but not parvocellular OT neurons.
“intravenous (i.v.) injections of the BBB impermeable retrograde tracer FluoroGold (FG) into the lateral tail vein enables selective labeling of magnocellular but not parvocellular OT neurons (Merchenthaler, 1991)”
From Parallel social information processing circuits are differentially impacted in autism (2020) · cites this paper as Merchenthaler, 1991
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Merchenthaler, I.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Merchenthaler, I.
- ORCID
- Merchenthaler, I.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 655-662
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084544923
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Keywords
- retrograde tracing, Fluoro-Gold, fenestrated capillaries, blood-brain barrier, diagonal band of Broca, medial preoptic area, organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, subfornical organ, paraventricular nucleus, arcuate nucleus, cranial motor neurons, mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus, sensory ganglia, rat central nervous system
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axonal Transport, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Capillaries, Cranial Nerves, Fluorescent Dyes, Ganglia, Spinal, Neurons, Stilbamidines, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review