Cited by 245Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Synchronous development of pyramidal neuron dendritic spines and parvalbumin-immunoreactive chandelier neuron axon terminals in layer III of monkey prefrontal cortex

Abstract

Postnatal development of the primate cerebral cortex involves an initial proliferation and the subsequent attrition of cortical synapses. Although these maturational changes in synaptic density have been observed across the cortical mantle, little is known about the precise time course of developmental refinements in synaptic inputs to specific populations of cortical neurons. We examined the postnatal development of two markers of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to a subpopulation of layer III pyramidal neurons in area 9 and 46 of rhesus monkey prefrontal cortex. These neurons are of particular interest because they play a major role in the flow of information both within and between cortical regions. Quantitative reconstructions of Golgi-impregnated mid-layer III pyramidal neurons revealed substantial developmental changes in the relative density of dendritic spines, the major site of excitatory inputs to these neurons. Relative spine density on both the apical and basilar dendritic trees increased by 50% during the first two postnatal months, remained at a plateau through 1.5 years of age, and then decreased over the peripubertal age range until stable adult levels were achieved. As a measure of the postnatal changes in inhibitory input to the axon initial segment of these pyramidal neurons, we determined the density of parvalbumin-immunoreactive axon terminals belonging to the chandelier class of local circuit neurons. The density of these distinctive axon terminals (cartridges) exhibited a temporal pattern of change that exactly paralleled the changes in dendritic spine density. These results suggest that subpopulations of cortical neurons may be regulated by dynamic interactions between excitatory and inhibitory inputs during development and, in concert with other data, they emphasize the cellular specificity of postnatal refinements in cortical circuitry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00051-j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Castration in a very small sample of male monkeys did not clearly impact the general pattern of synapse density decline in the prefrontal principal sulcus, but there were too few samples to draw strong conclusions.

    “Castration in a very small sample of male monkeys did not clearly impact the general pattern of synapse density decline in the prefrontal principal sulcus (Anderson et al., 1995); however, there were too few samples to draw strong conclusions.”
  • The age range in which pubertal milestones are reached is a time of decline in prefrontal cortex synapse density.

    “Again, the age range in which pubertal milestones are reached is a time of decline in prefrontal cortex synapse density (Anderson et al., 1995; Bourgeois et al., 1994; Drzewiecki et al., 2016; Gourley et al., 2012; Koss et al., 2014).”
  • In macaque prefrontal cortex, PV+ synapses that cluster on the axon initial segment decrease dramatically near macaque puberty onset.

    “while those that cluster on the axon initial segment decrease dramatically ( as visualized by parvalbumin immuno-staining) near macaque puberty onset (Anderson et al., 1995).”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 245

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jones, 1984, Laminar distribution of cortical efferent cells, Vol. 1, 521

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, S. A., Classey, J. D., Condé, F., Lund, J. S., & Lewis, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, D.A.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
7-22
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031501640
Cited by
245
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00519, MH 45156, P50MH045156)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
dendritic spines, chandelier cells, parvalbumin, pyramidal neurons, layer III, prefrontal cortex, postnatal development, synaptic refinement, inhibitory interneurons, axon terminals, excitation-inhibition balance, rhesus monkeys, cortical circuits, Golgi impregnation
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Dendrites, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Macaca mulatta, Male, Orchiectomy, Ovariectomy, Parvalbumins, Prefrontal Cortex, Presynaptic Terminals, Pyramidal Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review