The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition∗
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL INTERACTION: ELEMENTS OF A COGNITIVE IR THEORY
INGWERSEN, P. (1996) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026960 · Cited by 717
Information foraging in information access environments
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1995) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223904.223911 · Cited by 464
THONG, J. Y. L., HONG, W., & TAM, K.-Y. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(02)91024-4 · Cited by 347
How users assess Web pages for information seeking
Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20106 · Cited by 202
Trust in information sources: Seeking information from people, documents, and virtual agents
Hertzum, M., Andersen, H. H. K., Andersen, V., & Hansen, C. B. (2002) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(02)00023-1 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., & Nilan, M. S.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 755-776
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W2053757624
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition∗. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90050-c
- The paper
- Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M. B., & Nilan, M. S. (1990). A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition∗. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90050-c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
