The poster and other forms of scientific communication
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have faulted the design and format of the traditional poster as the main impediment to maximizing knowledge transfer with the ever-increasing crowds in poster sessions.
“Several studies have faulted the design and format of the traditional poster as the main impediment to maximizing knowledge transfer with the ever-increasing crowds in poster sessions (Dubois, 1985;Saffran, 1987).”
From Billboard-style posters preferred overall at two conferences, but should include more methods and limitations (2024) · cites this paper as Saffran, 1987
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oronje, B., Morrison, M., Suharlim, C., Folkman, K., Glaude-Hosh, A., & Jeisy-Scott, V. (2024) · doi:10.32388/p7n5bo.2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saffran, M.
- Corresponding author
- Saffran, Murray
- Venue
- Biochemical Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-30
- ISSN
- 0307-4412 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020774417
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochemical Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
- Keywords
- supported liquid membrane, cadmium, lead, heavy metal removal, coconut oil, Aliquat 336, flat sheet membranes, aqueous solutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review