OZCOT: A simulation model for cotton crop management
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In addition to GOSSYM/COMAX, other simulation models for cotton production systems were developed more recently: Cotton2K, COTCO2, OZCOT, and CROPGRO-Cotton.
“In addition to GOSSYM/COMAX, other simulation models for cotton production systems were developed more recently (Table 1): Cotton2K (Marani, 2004), COTCO2 (Wall et al., 1994), OZCOT (Hearn, 1994), and CROPGRO-Cotton (Jones et al., 2003; Pathak et al., 2007, 2012).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Hearn, 1994
OZCOT has been validated in commercial fields for both irrigated and rainfed cotton systems, in addition to validation using research experiments.
“In addition to validation using research experiments (Hearn, 1994), OZCOT also has been validated in commercial fields for both irrigated (Richards et al., 2008) and rainfed cotton systems (Bange et al., 2005).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Hearn, 1994
The Australian cotton model OZCOT is commonly used for irrigation water management research and decision support in Australia.
“The Australian cotton model, OZCOT (Hearn, 1994), is commonly used for irrigation water management research and decision support in Australia.”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Hearn, 1994
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Hearn, A. B.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hearn, A.B.
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-299
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141688865
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
- Keywords
- soil water balance, leaf area models, nitrogen fertilization, flooding stress, solar radiation, irrigation regimes, sowing date, decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
