Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL)

Oxford, Rebecca L., Burry-Stock, Judith A.·1995·System

DOI 10.1016/0346-251x(94)00047-a

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0346-251x(94)00047-a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Strategies for Language Learning and for Language Use: Revising the Theoretical Framework
MACARO, E. (2006) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x · Cited by 488
Culturally appropriate pedagogy: the case of group learning in a Confucian Heritage Culture context
Nguyen, P., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2006) · Intercultural Education · doi:10.1080/14675980500502172 · Cited by 226
Language teacher education in System
Guo, Q., Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.04.001 · Cited by 46
Untitled work
(2013) · European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences · Cited by 15

Authors: Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A.
Venue: System
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1995-02
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-23
ISSN: 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/0346-251x(94)00047-a
OpenAlex: W1980429754
Cited by: 704
References: 0
FWCI: 36.98
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review