Spin networks are simplicial quantum gravity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A spin network state can be represented as a labelling of triangles and tetrahedra in a triangulated 3-manifold by spins.
“Thus we may work in the 'dual picture' and think of a spin network state as a labelling of all the triangles and tetrahedra in S by spins [28,31,38,53].”
From Spin foam models (1998) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Hasslacher, B., & Perry, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Perry, Malcolm J.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-24
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035094480
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 44 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- spin networks, simplicial quantum gravity, simplicial complexes, angular momentum addition, path integral, Einstein-Hilbert action, spacetime foam
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
