Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The supersymmetric Casimir effect and quantum creation of the universe with nontrivial topology

Goncharov, Yu.P., Bytsenko, A.A.·1985·Physics Letters B

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90006-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the initial size of the universe was O(1), then at t >> 1 each particle within one cosmological time would run all over the torus many times, appearing in all parts with nearly equal probability; this chaotic mixing leads to rapid homogenization.

    “If the initial size of the universe was O(1), then at the time t ≫ 1 each particle (or a gravitational perturbation of metric) within one cosmological time would run all over the torus many times, appearing in all of its parts with nearly equal probability.This effect, called “chaotic mixing,” should lead to a rapid homogenization of the universe [5,6].”
  • Chaotic mixing can be very efficient in a compact hyperbolic universe.

    “Chaotic mixing can be very efficient in a compact hyperbolic universe (i.e. in a compactified version of an open universe) [5,6].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Linde, 1984, Rep. Prog. Phys., 47, 925, 10.1088/0034-4885/47/8/002 · DOI
  2. 1983, Phys. Rev., D27, 2848
  3. Atkatz, 1982, Phys. Rev., D25, 2065
  4. Hartle, 1983, Phys. Rev., D28, 2960
  5. Hawking, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B239, 257, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · DOI
  6. Halliwell, 1985, Phys. Rev., D31, 1777
  7. Hawking, 1985, Phys. Lett., 151B, 15, 10.1016/0370-2693(85)90815-9 · DOI
  8. Vilenkin, 1984, Phys. Rev., D30, 509
  9. 1985, Nucl. Phys., B252, 141
  10. Linde, 1984, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 87, 369
  11. Zeldovich, 1984, Pis'ma Astron. J., 10, 323
  12. Ellis, 1971, Gen. Rel. Grav., 2, 7, 10.1007/BF02450512 · DOI
  13. Borel, 1963, Topology, 2, 111, 10.1016/0040-9383(63)90026-0 · DOI
  14. Starobinsky, 1980, Phys. Lett., 91B, 99, 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X · DOI · Paper page
  15. De Witt, 1979, Physica, 96A, 197, 10.1016/0378-4371(79)90207-3 · DOI
  16. Nilles, 1984, Phys. Rep., 110, 2, 10.1016/0370-1573(84)90008-5 · DOI
  17. Cremmer, 1978, Phys. Lett., 79B, 231, 10.1016/0370-2693(78)90230-7 · DOI
  18. 1979, Nucl. Phys., B147, 105
  19. Ellis, 1984, Nucl. Phys., B241, 406, 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90054-3 · DOI
  20. van Nieuwenhuizen, 1981, Phys. Rep., 68, 190, 10.1016/0370-1573(81)90157-5 · DOI
  21. Goncharov, 1982, Phys. Lett., 91A, 153, 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90820-9 · DOI
  22. Goncharov, 1982, Phys. Lett., 119B, 403, 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90700-6 · DOI
  23. Goncharov, 1983, Phys. Lett., 133B, 433, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90822-5 · DOI
  24. Goncharov, 1984, Phys. Lett., 147B, 269, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90114-X · DOI
  25. Chockalingham, 1980, J. Phys., A13, 2723
  26. Dowker, 1979, J. Phys., A12, 2545
  27. Goncharov, 1985, Class. Quantum Grav., 2, 179, 10.1088/0264-9381/2/2/011 · DOI
  28. Zucker, 1975, J. Phys., A8, 1734

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goncharov, Y. P., & Bytsenko, A. A.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-10
Volume
160
Issue
6
Pages
385-390
ISSN
0370-2693
Cited by
33
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review