Cited by 229Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Through a black hole into a new universe?

Frolov, V.P., Markov, M.A., Mukhanov, V.F.·1989·Physics Letters B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0370-2693(89)91114-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frolov, V. P., Markov, M. A., & Mukhanov, V. F.
Affiliations
  • P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
216
Issue
3-4
Pages
272-276
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066696864
Cited by
229
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
black hole interior, Schwarzschild metric, de Sitter space, transition layer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review