The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of classical pion field in heavy ion high energy collisions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A remarkable result from RHIC experiments is that ideal hydrodynamic calculations of v 2 are in excellent agreement with the combined experimental results from STAR[147] and PHENIX[148] for a many hadron species, up to p T ∼ 2 GeV as shown in fig. 16.”
From Phase Transitions in the Early and Present Universe (2006) · cites this paper as [147]
Citations
Cites
Elementary Quantum Field Theory
Henley, E. M., Thirring, W. E., & Harris, J. D. (1963) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1969400 · Cited by 244
Elementary Quantum Field Theory
Henley, E. M., Thirring, W. E., & Polkinghorne, J. C. (1962) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3057921 · Cited by 220
Classical states of the chiral field and nuclear collisions at very high energy
Anselm, A. A. (1989) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91537-2 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Anselm, 1988, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 48, 49
- Rushbrooke, 1985, CERN-ER/85-124
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: “Event by event and violation”
Kharzeev, D. E., McLerran, L., & Warringa, H. J. (2008) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298 · Cited by 1,989
Parity violation in hot QCD: Why it can happen, and how to look for it
Kharzeev, D. E. (2005) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.075 · Cited by 626
ALICE: Physics Performance Report, Volume II
Alessandro, B., Antinori, F., Belikov, J. A., Blume, C., Dainese, A., Foka, P., Giubellino, P., Hippolyte, B., Kuhn, C. C., García, G. M., et al. (2006) · Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/10/001 · Cited by 567
Static and dynamic critical phenomena at a second order QCD phase transition
Rajagopal, K., & Wilczek, F. (1993) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90502-g · Cited by 550
Charge separation induced by -odd bubbles in QCD matter
Kharzeev, D. E., & ZHITNITSKY, A. R. (2007) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.10.001 · Cited by 519
Metadata
- Authors
- Anselm, A. A., & Ryskin, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (RU)
- ORCID
- Ryskin, M.G.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 482-484
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973849800
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Keywords
- heavy-ion collisions, chiral theories, pion production, chiral symmetry restoration, high-energy collisions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
