Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standard model stability bounds for new physics within LHC reach

Open access
Casas, J.A., Espinosa, J.R., Quirós, M.·1996·Physics Letters B

Abstract

Abstract We analyse the stability lower bounds on the Standard Model Higgs mass by carefully controlling the scale independence of the effective potential. We include resummed leading and next-to-leading-log corrections, and physical pole masses for the Higgs boson, MH, and the top-quark, Mt. Particular attention is devoted to the cases where the scale of new physics Λ is within LHC reach, i.e. Λ ≤ 10 TeV, which have been the object of recent controversial results. We clarify the origin of discrepancies and confirm our earlier results within the error of our previous estimate. In particular for Λ = 1 TeV we find that M H [GeV]>52+0.64(M 1 [GeV]−175)−0.50 α s (M Z −0.118 0.006 For fixed values of Mt and αs(MZ), the error from higher effects, as the lack of exact scale invariance of the effective potential and higher-order radiative corrections, is conservatively estimated to be ≲ 5 GeV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00682-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Cabibbo, 1979, Nucl. Phys. B, 158, 295, 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90167-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Duncan, 1985, Phys. Lett. B, 153, 165, 10.1016/0370-2693(85)91421-2 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91421-2
  3. Lindner, 1986, Z. Phys. C, 31, 295, 10.1007/BF01479540 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sher, 1989, Phys. Rep., 179, 273, 10.1016/0370-1573(89)90061-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sher, 1993, Phys. Lett. B, 317, 159, 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91586-C · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sher, 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 331, 448, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)91078-2 · DOI
  7. Lindner, 1989, Phys. Lett. B, 228, 139, 10.1016/0370-2693(89)90540-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Altarelli, 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 337, 141, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)91458-3 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Casas, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 342, 171, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)01404-Z · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kastening, 1992, Phys. Lett. B, 283, 287, 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90021-U · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90021-u
  11. Ford, 1993, Nucl. Phys. B, 395, 17, 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90206-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bando, 1993, Phys. Lett. B, 301, 83, 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90725-W · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90725-w
  13. Bando, 1993, Prog. Theor. Phys., 90, 405, 10.1143/PTP.90.405 · doi:10.1143/ptp.90.405
  14. Casas, 1995, Nucl. Phys. B, 436, 3, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)00508-C · DOI
  15. Hempfling, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 1386, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1386 · DOI
  16. Bochkarev, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, R2049, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.R2049 · DOI
  17. Gray, 1990, Z. Phys. C, 48, 673, 10.1007/BF01614703 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ford, 1992, Nucl. Phys. B, 387, 373, 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90165-8 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Espinosa, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 353, 257, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00572-3 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Casas, J. A., Espinosa, J. R., & Quirós, M.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
382
Issue
4
Pages
374-382
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084160068
Cited by
217
References
0
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standard model stability bounds for new physics within LHC reach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00682-x
The paper
Casas, J. A., Espinosa, J. R., & Quirós, M. (1996). Standard model stability bounds for new physics within LHC reach. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00682-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.