Learning variable and stereotypical sequences of responses: Some data and a new model
Abstract
In a left-right (L-R) choice situation, pigeons were exposed to a frequency-dependent schedule that selectively reinforced either the momentarily least-frequent pairs of responses (Experiment 1), or the least-frequent triplets of responses (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, the birds developed various stereotypical response patterns including double alternation (i.e. RRLLRRLL…), the stable pattern that satisfied the schedule constraint. In Experiment 2, three out of four birds developed random-like behavior. A linear operator reinforcement model, in the tradition of Bush and Mosteller, accounted for the qualitative features of pigeons' behavior in frequency-dependent schedules: strict alternation (i.e. RLRL…) when the schedule selectively reinforces the least-frequent individual response, double alternation when the least-frequent pairs are selectively reinforced, random-like behavior when the least-frequent triplets are selectively reinforced, and various stereotypical response patterns apparently not related to the target of selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machado (1993) incorporated short-term memory for past responses into his behavioral models.
“Machado (1993) remedied this by incorporating short-term memory for past responses into his behavioral models.”
From DYNAMIC RESPONSE-BY-RESPONSE MODELS OF MATCHING BEHAVIOR IN RHESUS MONKEYS (2005) · cites this paper as Machado (1993)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Machado, A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Machado, Armando
- ORCID
- Machado, Armando
- Venue
- Behavioural Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-129
- ISSN
- 0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061111481
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- pigeons, response sequences, schedule constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review