The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Growth response of northern red-oak and yellow-poplar seedlings to light, soil moisture and nutrients in relation to ecological strategy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tulip poplar was found to grow 36% greater than red oak under combined high levels of light, moisture, and nutrients.
“Similar to this study, tulip poplar was found to grow 36% greater than that of red oak under combined high levels of light, moisture, and nutrients [44].”
From Early Tree Growth in Reclaimed Mine Soils in Appalachia USA (2019) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hinckley, 1978, Leaf conductance and photosynthesis in four species of the oak-history forest type, For. Sci., 24, 73
- Immel, 1978, Comparative growth responses of northern red oak and chestnut oak to varying photoperiods, For. Sci., 24, 554
- Ramenskii, 1935, Principal apparatus, major concepts, and terms in the production typology of lands, geobotany, and ecology, Sov. Bot., 4, 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolb, T. E., Steiner, K. C., McCormick, L. H., & Bowersox, T. W.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCormick, L.H.
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 65-78
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014465935
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Seedling growth and survival studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- Quercus rubra, Liriodendron tulipifera, seedling growth, light intensity, soil moisture, soil fertility, resource constraints, stress tolerance, competitive strategy, root-shoot ratio, ecological strategies, forest regeneration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
