Cited by 25Coffee research and impactsPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesPregnancy and Medication Impact

Placental transfer of the major caffeine metabolite in the rat using 6-amino-5[N-formylmethylamino]1,3[Me-14C]-dimethyluracil administered orally or intravenously to the pregnant rat

Arnaud, Maurice J., Bracco, Ingrid, Sauvageat, Jean-Luc, Clerc, Marie-France·1983·Toxicology Letters

Abstract

6-Amino-5[N-formylmethylamino]1,3[Me-14C]dimethyluracil (1,3,7-DAU), the most important caffeine metabolite in the rat and a minor one in man was synthesized and administered p.o. or i.v. to pregnant rats. This study demonstrates the distribution of this metabolite in the animal and its transfer to the embryos and the fetus. The fetus was shown to be protected by a placental barrier which leads to a lower fetal tissue exposure 1 h after the administration, the equilibrium between fetus and pregnant rat being reached 4-5 h later. Future studies testing the fetotoxicity of this metabolite compared with caffeine must take into consideration that only about half of the oral dose is absorbed. In addition, similar fetal tissue exposure must be obtained when this metabolite is given orally or is produced from caffeine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-4274(83)90187-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once caffeine enters the fetal circulation, it is metabolized slowly because neither the placenta nor the fetus itself has cytochrome P450, the enzyme that metabolizes caffeine.

    “Once caffeine enters the fetal circulation, it is metabolized slowly because neither the placenta nor the fetus itself has cytochrome P450, the enzyme that metabolizes caffeine (166).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [166]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 25

Authors
Arnaud, M. J., Bracco, I., Sauvageat, J.-L., & Clerc, M.-F.
Affiliations
Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
Toxicology Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-05
Volume
16
Issue
3-4
Pages
271-279
ISSN
0378-4274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988761521
Cited by
25
References
15
Citations by year
2020: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
caffeine metabolites, placental transfer, placental barrier, prenatal exposure, pregnancy, oral and intravenous administration, fetal tissue distribution, fetal toxicity, caffeine
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Autoradiography, Caffeine, Feces, Female, Injections, Intravenous, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Pregnancy, Rats, Inbred Strains, Uracil, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review