Cited by 30Analytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of tazobactam and piperacillin in human plasma and urine

Augey, Valerie, Grosse, Pierre-Yves, Albert, Gregory, Audran, Michel, Bressolle, Françoise·1996·Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications

Abstract

A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with ultraviolet (UV) absorbance was developed for the analysis of piperacillin-tazobactam (tazocillin), in plasma and urine. The detection was performed at 218 nm for tazobactam and 222 nm for piperacillin. The procedure for assay of these two compounds in plasma and of piperacillin in urine involves the addition of an internal standard (ceftazidime for tazobactam and benzylpenicillin for piperacillin) followed by a treatment of the samples with acetonitrile and chloroform. To quantify tazobactam in urine, diluted samples were analysed using a column-switching technique without internal standard. The HPLC column, LiChrosorb RP-select B, was equilibrated with an eluent mixture composed of acetonitrile-ammonium acetate (pH 5). The proposed technique is reproducible, selective, and reliable. The method has been validated, and stability tests under various conditions have been performed. Linear detector responses were observed for the calibration curve standards in the ranges 5-60 micrograms/ml for tazobactam, and 1-100 micrograms/ml for piperacillin and spans what is currently though to be the clinically relevant range for tazocillin concentrations in body fluids. The limit of quantification was 3 micrograms/ml for tazobactam and 0.5 microgram/ml for piperacillin in plasma and urine. Extraction recoveries from plasma proved to be more than 85%. Precision, expressed as C.V., was in the range 0.4-18%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-4347(96)00049-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Augey, V., Grosse, P.-Y., Albert, G., Audran, M., & Bressolle, F.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montpellier (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (FR)
Corresponding author
Bressolle, Françoise
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
682
Issue
1
Pages
125-136
ISSN
0378-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997312735
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
tazobactam, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, plasma drug quantification, urine drug quantification, column switching, internal standard, drug stability testing, antibiotic pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Tazobactam, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Circadian Rhythm, Drug Stability, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Penicillanic Acid, Penicillins, Piperacillin, Reference Standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review