Cited by 379Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spontaneous compactification in six-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell theory

Randjbar-Daemi, S., Salam, Abdus, Strathdee, J.·1983·Nuclear Physics B

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90247-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For q=2, the only Maxwell field ansatz consistent with the symmetries of the metric is a monopole-like configuration on the extra-dimensional 2-sphere.

    “For q = 2, the only ansatz for the Maxwell field that is consistent with the symmetries of the metric is a monopole-like configuration on the extra-dimensional 2-sphere [10],”

    From Transdimensional tunneling in the multiverse (2010) · cites this paper as [10]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Horvath, 1977, Nucl. Phys., B127, 57, 10.1016/0550-3213(77)90351-0 · DOI
  2. Palla, 1978, Tokyo Conf. Report, 629
  3. Randjbar-Daemi, 1982, Phys. Lett., 117B, 41, 10.1016/0370-2693(82)90869-3 · DOI
  4. a] G. Chapline and R. Slansky, Los Alamos preprint LA 82-1076
  5. Salam, 1982, Ann. of Phys., 141, 316, 10.1016/0003-4916(82)90291-3 · DOI
  6. Freund, 1980, Phys. Lett., 97B, 233, 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90590-0 · DOI
  7. Abbot, 1982, Nucl. Phys., B195, 76, 10.1016/0550-3213(82)90049-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. van Nieuwenhuizen, 1974, Phys. Rev., D10, 401
  9. R. Percacci and S. Randjbar-Daemi, Kaluza-Klein theories on bundles with homogeneous fibres-I, ICTP, Trieste, preprint IC/82/18, J. Math. Phys. to appear
  10. Scherk, 1979, Nucl. Phys., B153, 61, 10.1016/0550-3213(79)90592-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Randjbar-Daemi, S., Salam, A., & Strathdee, J.
Affiliations
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-04
Volume
214
Issue
3
Pages
491-512
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006776556
Cited by
379
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
33.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
Einstein-Maxwell equations, six-dimensional spacetime, spontaneous compactification, magnetic monopoles, constant curvature spacetimes, 2-sphere, mass spectra, classical stability, dimensional reduction, effective Lagrangian, SU(2) x U(1) gauge theory, chiral coupling, Kaluza-Klein theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review