Cited by 411Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Calculation of gauge couplings and compact circumferences from self-consistent dimensional reduction

Candelas, Philip, Weinberg, Steven·1984·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90001-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Candelas, P., & Weinberg, S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-05
Volume
237
Issue
3
Pages
397-441
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983357614
Cited by
411
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
32.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
gauge coupling, compactified extra dimensions, dimensional reduction, quantum gravity, one-loop effective potential, Einstein-Hilbert term, scalar field, spinor fields, sphere, simple Lie groups, large N limit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review