The path integral measure, conformal factor problem and stability of the ground state of quantum gravity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It has been suggested that the conformal contribution is canceled by a Faddeev-Popov determinant, and preliminary supporting computations have been made in a proper time gauge.
“This has led to a suggestion [100, 99] that the conformal contribution is canceled by a Faddeev-Popov determinant (see also [198]), and some preliminary supporting computations have been made in a proper time gauge [100].”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [198]
Cites
Role of Conformal Three-Geometry in the Dynamics of Gravitation
York, J. W. (1972) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.1082 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe
Carlip, S. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-1 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Euclidean Wormholes, Baby Universes, and Their Impact on Particle Physics and Cosmology
Hebecker, A., Mikhail, T., & Soler, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00035 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Linear response, validity of semiclassical gravity, and the stability of flat space
Anderson, P. R., Molina-París, C., & Mottola, E. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.024026 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationFinite spin-foam-based theory of three- and four-dimensional quantum gravity
Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.024020 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mazur, P. O., & Mottola, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Mottola, Emil
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-212
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047055602
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- quantum gravity, path integral measure, conformal perturbation, ground state stability, Polyakov action, field redefinitions, Euclidean path integral, unitarity, infrared stability, flat spacetime, one-loop effective action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
