Solving the time-evolution problem in 2 + 1 gravity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A related first-order Hamiltonian lattice model has been studied by Waelbroeck et al.
“A related first-order Hamiltonian lattice model has been studied by Waelbroeck et al. [266, 267, 268, 270].”
From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [268]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe
Carlip, S. (2005) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2005-1 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waelbroeck, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Waelbroeck, Henri
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 475-494
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017318872
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- three-dimensional gravity, Cauchy horizon, total mass, deficit angle, Euler characteristic, geons, wormholes, topological defects, Minkowski space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
