The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes
Open accessAbstract
We compute the leading order (in coupling) rate of emission of low energy quanta from a slightly non-extremal system of 1-D- and 5-D-branes. We also compute the classical cross-section, and hence the Hawking emission rate, for low energy scalar quanta for the black hole geometry that corresponds to these branes (at sufficiently strong coupling). These rates are found to agree with each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
Cited by
Ultimate physical limits to computation
Lloyd, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023282 · Cited by 1,120
The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction
Mathur, S. D. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001 · Cited by 975
Self-citationThe fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review
Mathur, S. D. (2005) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 · Cited by 937
Self-citationBlack hole greybody factors and D-brane spectroscopy
Maldacena, J., & Strominger, A. (1997) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.861 · Cited by 409
BLACK HOLES IN THEORIES WITH LARGE EXTRA DIMENSIONS: A REVIEW
KANTI, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04018324 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, S. R., & Mathur, S. D.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 478
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 561-576
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017982600
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00453-1
- The paper
- Das, S. R., & Mathur, S. D. (1996). Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00453-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
