Cited by 181Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis

Larsson, H.B.W., Thomsen, C., Frederiksen, J., Stubgaard, M., Henriksen, O.·1992·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Measurement of water self-diffusion in the brain in 25 patients with multiple sclerosis was performed by magnetic resonance imaging. Quantitative diffusion measurements were obtained using single spin-echo pulse sequences with pulsed magnetic field gradients of different magnitude. Twenty-two of these patients also underwent measurement of the transverse relaxation time (T2). Only one plaque was evaluated in each patient. Based on prior knowledge, 12 plaques were classified as being 3 mo or less in age, and 7 plaques were classified as being more than 3 mo old. In all 25 plaques, water self-diffusion was found to be higher than in apparently normal white matter. Furthermore, water self-diffusion was found to be higher in acute plaques compared with chronic plaques. Finally, a slight tendency toward a relationship between the diffusion capability and T2 was found. We believe that an increased diffusion capability signifies an increase of the extracellular water space, which probably is related to the degree of demyelination. Thus, measurement of water self-diffusion in multiple sclerosis plaques may contribute to the study of pathogenesis of demyelination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0730-725x(92)90367-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In chronic post mortem MS brain, MD and FA appear to be mainly affected by loss of structure due to demyelination and, to a lesser degree, axonal loss, resulting in larger intercellular spaces.

    “Hence, our data suggest that in chronic post mortem MS brain MD and FA appear to be mainly affected by a loss of structure due to demyelination and – to a lesser degree axonal loss – resulting in larger intercellular spaces”

    From Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain (2007) · cites this paper as Larsson et al., 1992

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 14 · Cited by 181

Authors
Larsson, H. B. W., Thomsen, C., Frederiksen, J., Stubgaard, M., & Henriksen, O.
Affiliations
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
  • Gentofte Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Larsson, H.B.W.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
7-12
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995636981
Cited by
181
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, water self-diffusion, diffusion-weighted imaging, brain plaques, demyelination, T2 relaxation time, white matter
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Demyelinating Diseases, Extracellular Space, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review