In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Measurement of water self-diffusion in the brain in 25 patients with multiple sclerosis was performed by magnetic resonance imaging. Quantitative diffusion measurements were obtained using single spin-echo pulse sequences with pulsed magnetic field gradients of different magnitude. Twenty-two of these patients also underwent measurement of the transverse relaxation time (T2). Only one plaque was evaluated in each patient. Based on prior knowledge, 12 plaques were classified as being 3 mo or less in age, and 7 plaques were classified as being more than 3 mo old. In all 25 plaques, water self-diffusion was found to be higher than in apparently normal white matter. Furthermore, water self-diffusion was found to be higher in acute plaques compared with chronic plaques. Finally, a slight tendency toward a relationship between the diffusion capability and T2 was found. We believe that an increased diffusion capability signifies an increase of the extracellular water space, which probably is related to the degree of demyelination. Thus, measurement of water self-diffusion in multiple sclerosis plaques may contribute to the study of pathogenesis of demyelination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In chronic post mortem MS brain, MD and FA appear to be mainly affected by loss of structure due to demyelination and, to a lesser degree, axonal loss, resulting in larger intercellular spaces.
“Hence, our data suggest that in chronic post mortem MS brain MD and FA appear to be mainly affected by a loss of structure due to demyelination and – to a lesser degree axonal loss – resulting in larger intercellular spaces”
From Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain (2007) · cites this paper as Larsson et al., 1992
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 14 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Larsson, H. B. W., Thomsen, C., Frederiksen, J., Stubgaard, M., & Henriksen, O.
- Affiliations
- Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
- Gentofte Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Larsson, H.B.W.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-12
- ISSN
- 0730-725X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995636981
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, water self-diffusion, diffusion-weighted imaging, brain plaques, demyelination, T2 relaxation time, white matter
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Demyelinating Diseases, Extracellular Space, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review