Cited by 59Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

An abnormal neural reflex plays a role in causing syncope in sinus bradycardia

Open access
Alboni, Paolo, Menozzi, Carlo, Brignole, Michele, Paparella, Nelly, Lolli, Gino, Oddone, Daniele, Dinelli, Maurizio·1993·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study investigates the role of an abnormal neural reflex in causing syncope in patients with sinus bradycardia.Background Syncope is commonly considered an indication of severity in sinus bradycardia. However, the occurrence of syncope is unpredictable, and the prognosis appears to be similar in patients with and without syncope.Methods Head-up tilt testing (60 degrees for 60 min), carotid sinus massage in the supine and standing positions, 24-h Holter ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) recording and electrophysiologic study before and after pharmacologic autonomic blockade were performed in 25 patients with sinus bradycardia and syncope (group I, sinus rate < 50 beats/min, age 71 +/- 12 years) and 25 patients with sinus bradycardia and no neurologic symptoms (group II, sinus rate < 50 beats/min, age 67 +/- 16 years).Results Clinical characteristics and ambulatory ECG monitoring data were similar in the two study groups. A positive response (induction of syncope or presyncope with hypotension and/or bradycardia) was obtained by head-up tilt testing in 15 group I (60%) and in 3 group II (12%) patients (p < 0.001) and by carotid sinus massage in 11 group I (44%) and 6 group II (24%) patients (p = NS). Results of at least one test (head-up tilt testing or carotid sinus massage, or both) were positive in 19 group I (76%) and 9 group II (36%) patients (p < 0.01). Basal and intrinsic corrected sinus node recovery time did not differ significantly between the two groups. An abnormal intrinsic heart rate was present in 66% of group I and 26% of group II patients (p < 0.01). The different percentage of positive findings on head-up tilt testing and carotid sinus massage in the two groups was independent of the presence of intrinsic sinus node dysfunction.Conclusions These results indicate that an abnormal neural reflex plays a role in causing syncope in patients with sinus bradycardia. This reflex seems to be unrelated to the severity of sinus node dysfunction, even if the latter could enhance the cardioinhibitory response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90427-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multifactorial mechanisms are likely in other types of cardiac syncope, e.g. aortic stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and sick sinus syndrome.

    “Similarly, multifactorial mechanisms are likely in other types of cardiac syncope, e.g. aortic stenosis, 133 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 134 and sick sinus syndrome. 135,136”
  • An increased susceptibility to neurally mediated bradycardia/hypotension is often the cause of syncope in patients with sinus node disease.

    “Thus, an increased susceptibility to neurally mediated bradycardia/ hypotension is often the cause of syncope. 135,136”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 59

Authors
Alboni, P., Menozzi, C., Brignole, M., Paparella, N., Lolli, G., Oddone, D., & Dinelli, M.
Affiliations
Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-10
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
1130-1134
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027567813
Cited by
59
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
syncope, sinus bradycardia, neural reflexes, head-up tilt, carotid sinus massage, autonomic dysfunction, intrinsic heart rate, sinus node recovery time, cardioinhibitory response, presyncope, autonomic blockade
MeSH terms
Aged, Autonomic Nervous System, Bradycardia, Carotid Sinus, Electrocardiography, Electrophysiology, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Massage, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Reflex, Abnormal, Severity of Illness Index, Sinoatrial Node, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Supine Position

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review