Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 464

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry

Open access
Cerqueira, Manuel D., Verani, Mario S., Schwaiger, Markus, Heo, Jaekyeong, Iskandrian, Abdulmassih S.·1994·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of adenosine infusion at 140 micrograms/kg per min in conjunction with radionuclide imaging in 9,256 consecutive patients. BACKGROUND: Adenosine produces maximal myocardial hyperemia directly with a rapid onset of action. In addition, when used in conjunction with radionuclide perfusion imaging, it has proven efficacy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise. Because the ultrashort half-life (< 10s) allows dose titration and rapid reversal of side effects, it may be safer than other available pharmacologic agents. METHODS: Patients were prospectively entered at 21 clinical sites. Information on safety and adverse events during and immediately after adenosine infusion was maintained in the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. RESULTS: The infusion protocol was completed in 80% of patients, required dose reduction in 13% and was terminated early in 7%. Interpretable imaging studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients, and 0.8% of patients received aminophylline. Minor and well tolerated side effects were reported in 81.1% of patients. There were no deaths, one myocardial infarction, seven episodes of severe bronchospasm and one episode of pulmonary edema. Transient atrioventricular (AV) node block occurred in 706 patients (first-degree in 256, second-degree in 378 and third-degree in 72) and resolved spontaneously in most patients (n = 508) without alteration in the adenosine infusion. There were no sustained episodes of AV block. Patients > 70 years of age had an increased risk of developing AV block (age < 70, 7.05% vs. > or = 70, 9.44%, p = 0.001, relative risk 1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine infusion is safe. Vasodilator and negative dromotropic side effects are generally well tolerated. Serious side effects are relatively rare, and they reverse with termination of adenosine infusion. Interpretable radionuclide studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients and aminophylline reversal was seldom required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 464

Metadata

Authors
Cerqueira, M. D., Verani, M. S., Schwaiger, M., Heo, J., & Iskandrian, A. S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
384-389
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114023904
Cited by
464
References
0
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
The paper
Cerqueira, M. D., Verani, M. S., Schwaiger, M., Heo, J., & Iskandrian, A. S. (1994). Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.