The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of adenosine infusion at 140 micrograms/kg per min in conjunction with radionuclide imaging in 9,256 consecutive patients. BACKGROUND: Adenosine produces maximal myocardial hyperemia directly with a rapid onset of action. In addition, when used in conjunction with radionuclide perfusion imaging, it has proven efficacy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise. Because the ultrashort half-life (< 10s) allows dose titration and rapid reversal of side effects, it may be safer than other available pharmacologic agents. METHODS: Patients were prospectively entered at 21 clinical sites. Information on safety and adverse events during and immediately after adenosine infusion was maintained in the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. RESULTS: The infusion protocol was completed in 80% of patients, required dose reduction in 13% and was terminated early in 7%. Interpretable imaging studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients, and 0.8% of patients received aminophylline. Minor and well tolerated side effects were reported in 81.1% of patients. There were no deaths, one myocardial infarction, seven episodes of severe bronchospasm and one episode of pulmonary edema. Transient atrioventricular (AV) node block occurred in 706 patients (first-degree in 256, second-degree in 378 and third-degree in 72) and resolved spontaneously in most patients (n = 508) without alteration in the adenosine infusion. There were no sustained episodes of AV block. Patients > 70 years of age had an increased risk of developing AV block (age < 70, 7.05% vs. > or = 70, 9.44%, p = 0.001, relative risk 1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine infusion is safe. Vasodilator and negative dromotropic side effects are generally well tolerated. Serious side effects are relatively rare, and they reverse with termination of adenosine infusion. Interpretable radionuclide studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients and aminophylline reversal was seldom required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coronary Heart Disease in Smokers: Vitamin C Restores Coronary Microcirculatory Function
Kaufmann, P. A., Gnecchi-Ruscone, T., di Terlizzi, M., Schäfers, K. P., Lüscher, T. F., & Camici, P. G. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.11.1233 · Cited by 246
(1999) · PubMed · Cited by 230
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia.
Kaufmann, P. A., Gnecchi-Ruscone, T., Schäfers, K. P., Lüscher, T. F., & Camici, P. G. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00697-5 · Cited by 217
(2004) · PubMed · Cited by 146
Hendel, R. C., Bateman, T. M., Cerqueira, M. D., Iskandrian, A. E., Leppo, J. A., Blackburn, B., & Mahmarian, J. J. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.097 · Cited by 128
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerqueira, M. D., Verani, M. S., Schwaiger, M., Heo, J., & Iskandrian, A. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 384-389
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114023904
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
- The paper
- Cerqueira, M. D., Verani, M. S., Schwaiger, M., Heo, J., & Iskandrian, A. S. (1994). Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: Results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.