The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in hypertension treatment trials
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This work was done to determine the role of hypertension treatment in the prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure. BACKGROUND: Lowering of blood pressure in hypertensive patients has been reported to reduce morbidity and mortality from strokes and myocardial infarction. Data on primary prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure have not previously been carefully quantified. METHODS: All the major long-term hypertension treatment trials over the past 20 years were reviewed. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred ninety-three of 13,342 subjects in the control groups compared with only 95 of 13,389 in the treated groups progressed from less severe to severe hypertension. The incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated compared with control or placebo subjects was 140 of 6,150 and 216 of 6,098 subjects, respectively; congestive heart failure occurred in 240 of 6,923 subjects in the control group compared with only 112 of 6,914 treated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The lowering of blood pressure over a 3- to 5-year period of time is effective in preventing severe disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in addition to strokes and myocardial infarction. In an era when expensive and often complicated methods are being used to prevent recurrence of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, it is important to highlight the role of antihypertensive therapy in primary prevention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473
Wood, D., De Backer, G., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Mancia, G., & Pyörälä, K. (1998) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/s0021-9150(98)90209-x · Cited by 1,255
Second Joint Task Force of European (1998) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1243 · Cited by 1,131
Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Deswal, A., Dunbar, S. B., Francis, G. S., Horwich, T., Jessup, M., Kosiborod, M., Pritchett, A. M., Ramasubbu, K., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000450 · Cited by 522
De Backer, G., Ambrosioni, E., Broch-Johnsen, K., Brotons, C., Cifkova, R., Dallongeville, J., Ebrahim, S., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Mancia, G., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00149831-200312001-00001 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Moser, M., & Hebert, P. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1214-1218
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081861176
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in hypertension treatment trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00606-0
- The paper
- Moser, M., & Hebert, P. R. (1996). Prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in hypertension treatment trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(95)00606-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.