“Why go to school to learn miskitu?”: Changing constructs of bilingualism, education and literacy among the Miskitu of Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All three generations on the Northern Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua speak Miskitu.
“All three generations on the Northern Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua speak Miskitu (Freeland, 1995(Freeland, , 2003(Freeland, , 2013;;Koskinen, 1995).”
From Reclaiming and Learning Indigenous Languages on Social Media with Digital Activists: Insights from Lampung, Mayangna and Miskitu Youth (2020) · cites this paper as Freeland, 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hinton, L. L., & Putra, K. A. (2020) · The Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (JSLAT) · doi:10.2458/jslat.2161 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Freeland, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Freeland, Jane
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-261
- ISSN
- 0738-0593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083828129
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
- Keywords
- Miskitu, bilingual education, language planning, literacy, New Literacy Studies, indigenous education, Sandinista revolution, language ideology, cultural constructs, Caribbean coast of Nicaragua, indigenous languages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
