The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social role negotiation skills for substance-abusing adolescents: A group model
Open accessAbstract
A group model for therapeutic early intervention (secondary prevention) with nonaddicted adolescent substance abusers is proposed, based on a Social Role Negotiation model of substance abuse integrating concepts form role theory and cognitive developmental theory. The description of the group model, a structured short-term approach, includes a variety of exercises which promote developmental improvement in the essential skills of role-taking, role-making, and definition of the situation. An individualized intervention strategy is proposed for each group member, based on a theory-based taxonomy of substance-related problems. Strategies for using family involvement to support an adolescent group are described.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this regard, the studies by Spoth and Redmond (16) and Blume et al. (17) suggest that the existence of supportive structures and networks, as well as supportive interventions such as spiritual and familial support have major role in promotion of treatment goals in drug abusers and prevention of relapse.”
From The Role of Family Expressed Emotion and Perceived Social Support in Predicting Addiction Relapse (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Brock, 1983, A comparison of the relationship enhancement program and the Minnesota Couple Communication Program, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 413, 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01530.x · DOI
- Burr, 1979, Symbolic interaction and the family, Vol. 2
- Eisenberg, 1984, Social competence: A developmental perspective, School Psychology Review, 13, 267, 10.1080/02796015.1984.12085105 · DOI
- Fischer, 1980, A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills, Psychological Review, 87, 477, 10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477 · DOI
- Glynn, 1981, From family to peer: A review of transitions of influence among drug-using youth, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10, 363, 10.1007/BF02088939 · DOI
- Joanning, 1992, Treating adolescent drug abuse: A comparison of family systems therapy, group therapy, and family drug education, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 345, 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1992.tb00948.x · DOI
- Quinn, 1988, Families of adolescent drug abusers: Systemic interventions to attain drug-free behavior, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 14, 65, 10.3109/00952998809001536 · DOI
- Russell, 1984, A social skills analysis in childhood and adolescence using symbolic interaction, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 73, 10.1007/BF02088655 · DOI
- Sarbin, 1968, Role theory, Vol. 1
- Stanton, 1979, Family treatment approaches to drug abuse problems: A review, Family Process, 18, 251, 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00251.x · DOI
- Staub, 1981, Social cognition, affect, and behavior: An essay and review of Robert Selman's The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses, Developmental Review, 1, 385, 10.1016/0273-2297(81)90033-2 · DOI
- Todd, 1991, The evolution of family therapy approaches to substance abuse: Personal reflections and thoughts on integration, Contemporary Family Therapy, 13, 471, 10.1007/BF00890499 · DOI
Cited by
The Role of Family Expressed Emotion and Perceived Social Support in Predicting Addiction Relapse
Atadokht, A., Hajloo, N., Karimi, M., & Narimani, M. (2015) · International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction · doi:10.5812/ijhrba.21250 · Cited by 98
“(17) suggest that the existence of supportive structures and networks, as well as supportive interventions such as spiritual and familial support have major role in promotion of treatment goals in drug abusers and prevention of relapse.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Blume, T. W., Green, S., Joanning, H., & Quinn, W. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Detroit Mercy (US)
- Nova Southeastern University (US)
- Iowa State University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blume, Thomas W.
- Venue
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064373802
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da003773-12)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA03773,)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- adolescent substance abuse, group therapy, secondary prevention, early intervention, role theory, cognitive development theory, perspective taking, role-making, definition of the situation, family involvement, personalized interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Decision Making, Family, Group Processes, Health Education, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychotherapy, Group, Role, Role Playing, Social Adjustment, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Negotiating, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
