The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financing and cost of standard and enhanced methadone treatment
Open accessAbstract
Although some national surveys of drug-abuse treatment have examined cost and financing issues, our study is one of the first to rigorously analyze the costs and financing of methadone treatment at the program level. Our findings are similar to those found at the national level for treatment cost but deviate significantly from the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Unit Survey (NDATUS) findings on funding sources. In addition to examining financing and total cost, we grouped resources into particular categories and examined variations at the client, program, regimen, and setting levels. Our specific findings show that public funding sources overwhelmingly support the programs examined; the average annual cost per client for standard methadone treatment was between $3,750 and $4,400; the marginal cost of providing enhanced treatment was between 5% and 6% of the total annual cost of standard treatment; and the average annual cost at the freestanding community-based programs was significantly different from the average annual cost at the hospital-based treatment program. Our results provide a treatment cost methodology along with a financial profile of treatment operations at three clinics that can be compared across programs and settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DATCAP is a program-level data collection instrument designed to estimate the costs of a substance abuse treatment program based on standard economic principles.
“The DATCAP is a program-level data collection instrument designed to estimate the costs of a substance abuse treatment program based on standard economic principles.”
From The economic costs of substance abuse treatment: Updated estimates and cost bands for program assessment and reimbursement (2008) · cites this paper as Bradley, French, & Rachal, 1994
Citations
Cites
Cost analysis of training and employment services in methadone treatment
French, M. T., Bradley, C. J., Calingaert, B., Dennis, M. L., & Karuntzos, G. T. (1994) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(94)90048-5 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Anglin, 1989, Consequences and costs of shutting off methadone, Addictive Behaviors, 14, 307, 10.1016/0306-4603(89)90062-2 · DOI
- Goldschmidt, 1976, A cost-effectiveness model for evaluating health care programs: Application to drug abuse treatment, Inquiry, 29
- Hannan, 1976, The benefits and costs of methadone maintenance, Public Policy, 24, 197
- Hellinger, 1990, Updated forecasts of the costs of medical care for persons with AIDS, 1989–1993, Public Health Reports, 105, 1
- Horton, 1983, Cost-effectiveness and user characteristics of client-based services for the treatment of diarrhea: A case study in Bangladesh, Social Science Medicine, 17, 721, 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90260-5 · DOI
- McLellan, 1988, Is the counselor an “active ingredient” in substance abuse rehabilitation? An examination of treatment success among four counselors, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 423, 10.1097/00005053-198807000-00004 · DOI
- 1991, Substance Abuse Report, 22, 1
- Thornton, 1990, Assessing the costs and outcomes together: Cost effectiveness analysis of two systems of acute psychiatric care, Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 231, 10.1016/0149-7189(90)90054-Z · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
French, M. T., Popovici, I., & Tapsell, L. (2008) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.12.008 · Cited by 85
Self-citationCost analysis of training and employment services in methadone treatment
French, M. T., Bradley, C. J., Calingaert, B., Dennis, M. L., & Karuntzos, G. T. (1994) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(94)90048-5 · Cited by 40
Self-citationThe Economic Cost of Substance Abuse Treatment in the State of Florida
Alexandre, P. K., Beulaygue, I. C., French, M. T., McCollister, K. E., Popovici, I., & Sayed, B. A. (2012) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x12450164 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, C. J., French, M. T., & Rachal, J. V.
- Affiliations
- RTI International (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 433-442
- ISSN
- 0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981359726
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- methadone maintenance treatment, treatment costs, treatment funding, community-based treatment, opioid use disorder
- MeSH terms
- Ambulatory Care, Combined Modality Therapy, Community Mental Health Services, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Expenditures, Financing, Government, Humans, Methadone, Opioid-Related Disorders, Recurrence, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review