The basis of consistency effects in word naming
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The magnitude of the consistency effect for any word depends on the summed frequency of its friends in relation to that of its enemies.
“The magnitude of the consistencyeffect for anyword depends on the summed frequencyof its friends (having similar spelling pattern and similar pronunciation) in relation to that of its enemies (having similar spelling pattern but dissimilar pronunciation) (Jared, McRae, & Seidenberg, 1990).”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as Jared, McRae, & Seidenberg, 1990
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 355
- Authors
- Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Seidenberg, Mark S
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 687-715
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998648550
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- word naming, word recognition, phonological consistency, lexical decision, naming latency, phonological processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
