Cited by 538Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsInnovative Teaching MethodsEducation Practices and Evaluation

Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education

Damon, William, Phelps, Erin·1989·International Journal of Educational Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Storch's model of patterns of interaction draws attention to mutuality as impacting on success of task-based interaction between peers.

    “Storch's (2002) model of patterns of interaction, based on Damon and Phelps (1989), has been particularly influential here because it draws attention to mutuality in particular as impacting on success of task-based interaction between peers.”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Damon and Phelps (1989)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Damon, W., & Phelps, E.
Affiliations
Clark University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
9-19
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979511254
Cited by
538
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Practices and Evaluation
Keywords
peer education, peer tutoring, cooperative learning, peer collaboration, educational dialogue, joint problem solving, intrinsic rewards, extrinsic rewards, competition among students, task structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review