Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 19Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender Studies in LanguageGender, Sexuality, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do actions speak louder than words? An effect of the functional use of language on dominant sex role behavior in boys and girls

Hendrick, Joanne, Stange, Terry·1991·Early Childhood Research Quarterly

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0885-2006(91)90037-l

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Hendrick, J., & Stange, T.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Hendrick, Joanne
Venue
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
565-576
ISSN
0885-2006 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084145058
Cited by
19
References
19
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Early Childhood Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sex-role behavior, preschool children, teacher-child interaction, gender differences, teacher role modeling, children's social development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.