The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision theoretic generalizations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications
Open accessAbstract
We describe a generalization of the PAC learning model that is based on statistical decision theory. In this model the learner receives randomly drawn examples, each example consisting of an instance x in X and an outcome y in Y , and tries to find a hypothesis h : X --< A , where h in H , that specifies the appropriate action a in A to take for each instance x , in order to minimize the expectation of a loss l(y,a). Here X, Y, and A are arbitrary sets, l is a real-valued function, and examples are generated according to an arbitrary joint distribution on X times Y . Special cases include the problem of learning a function from X into Y , the problem of learning the conditional probability distribution on Y given X (regression), and the problem of learning a distribution on X (density estimation). We give theorems on the uniform convergence of empirical loss estimates to true expected loss rates for certain hypothesis spaces H , and show how this implies learnability with bounded sample size, disregarding computational complexity. As an application, we give distribution-independent upper bounds on the sample size needed for learning with feedforward neural networks. Our theorems use a generalized notion of VC dimension that applies to classes of real-valued functions, adapted from Pollard''s work, and a notion of *capacity* and *metric dimension* for classes of functions that map into a bounded metric space. (Supersedes 89-30 and 90-52.) [Also in "Information and Computation", Vol. 100, No.1, September 1992]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (1971) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1116025 · Cited by 2,448
Cited by
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578
(2015) · Cited by 2,857
Image indexing using color correlograms
Huang, J., Kumar, S. R., Mitra, M., Zhu, W.-J., & Zabih, R. (2002) · Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1997.609412 · Cited by 1,646
On the mathematical foundations of learning
Cucker, F., & Smale, S. (2001) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-01-00923-5 · Cited by 1,545
Foundations of Machine Learning
Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,122
Metadata
- Authors
- Haussler, D.
- Venue
- Information and Computation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-150
- ISSN
- 0890-5401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084544490
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision theoretic generalizations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0890-5401(92)90010-d
- The paper
- Haussler, D. (1992). Decision theoretic generalizations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications. Information and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(92)90010-d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.