Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods

Scapens, Robert W.·1990·The British Accounting Review

DOI 10.1016/0890-8389(90)90008-6

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0890-8389(90)90008-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Accounting and network coordination
Håkansson, H., & Lind, J. (2004) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00058-2 · Cited by 301
Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research
Lukka, K., & Vinnari, E. (2014) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-03-2013-1265 · Cited by 299
A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9491-6 · Cited by 129
Fast fashion: calculative technologies and the governance of everyday dress
Jeacle, I. (2015) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2014.921573 · Cited by 32

Authors: Scapens, R. W.
Venue: The British Accounting Review
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1990-09
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 259-281
ISSN: 0890-8389 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/0890-8389(90)90008-6
OpenAlex: W1964295097
Cited by: 862
References: 0
FWCI: 12.17
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review