Cited by 86Psychedelics and Drug StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Chronic treatment with (W)DOI, a psychotomimetic 5-HT2 agonist, downregulates 5-HT2 receptors in rat brain

MCKENNA, D·1989·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

(+/-)DOI (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodo-phenylisopropylamine) is a hallucinogenic phenylalkylamine that has been characterized as a 5-HT2-selective agonist. Chronic treatment with (+/-)DOI [1.0 mg/kg/day (2.8 mumol/kg) for 8 days] significantly reduced the binding of [3H]ketanserin, [125I]LSD, and [125I]R-DOI as measured at single ligand concentrations in rat cortical homogenates. In saturation studies, chronic DOI treatment significantly lowered the Bmax of [3H]ketanserin binding and the high-affinity binding of [125I]R-DOI without altering the Kd values. In rats treated acutely with a single dose of (+/-)DOI, binding of [125I]R-DOI, [125I]LSD, and [3H]ketanserin was not significantly different from controls in membranes preincubated at 37 degrees C for 60 minutes. In all experiments nonspecific binding was determined by incubation with 1 microM ritanserin. This work demonstrates that chronic treatment with a 5-HT2-selective agonist hallucinogen reduces the number of binding sites for 5-HT2 agonists as well as for 5-HT2 antagonists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0893-133x(89)90010-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saturation binding studies indicated chronic DOI treatment significantly lowered Bmax values for [3H]-ketanserin and R-[125I]-DOI without altering KD values.

    “Saturation binding studies indicated that chronic DOI treatment significantly lowered the Bmax values for [3H]-ketanserin and R-[125I]-DOI (16) without altering the KD values.”
  • Chronic treatment with (+/−)-DOI (1 mg/kg daily for a week) significantly reduced binding of [3H]ketanserin, [125I]-LSD, and R-[125I]-DOI in rat cortical homogenates.

    “Thus, chronic treatment with (+/−)-DOI (1 mg/kg daily for a week) significantly reduced the binding of [3H]ketanserin, [125I]-LSD (25), and R-[125I]-DOI (16) as measured at single ligand concentrations in rat cortical homogenates [80].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MCKENNA, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
MCKENNA, D
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
81-87
ISSN
0893-133X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018680292
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
digital object identifiers, 5-HT2 receptor, ketanserin binding, receptor binding sites, receptor desensitization
MeSH terms
Amphetamines, Animals, Binding Sites, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Male, Receptors, Serotonin, Down-Regulation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review