Cited by 46Heat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer and Numerical MethodsHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies

Experimental investigation of thermal conductance of finned tube contacts

Sheffield, J.W., Wood, R.A., Sauer, H.J.·1989·Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0894-1777(89)90055-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheffield, J. W., Wood, R. A., & Sauer, H. J.
Affiliations
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Venue
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
107-121
ISSN
0894-1777 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044456755
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Keywords
thermal contact conductance, interference fit, fin spacing, fin thickness, tube diameter, heat transfer, vacuum chamber testing, empirical correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review