Experimental investigation of thermal conductance of finned tube contacts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sheffield et al. [12] reported that the contact conductance, hc, ranged from 10,607 to 30,828 W m-2 K-1.
“She eld et al. [12] reported that the contact conductance, h c , ranged from 10,607 to 30,828 W m 2 K 1 .”
From Heat transfer and friction characteristics of plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers, part II: Correlation (2000) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C.-C., Chi, K.-Y., & Chang, C.-J. (2000) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/s0017-9310(99)00333-6 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Ye, H.-Y., & Lee, K.-S. (2013) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.08.026 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sheffield, J. W., Wood, R. A., & Sauer, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
- Venue
- Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-121
- ISSN
- 0894-1777 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044456755
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Keywords
- thermal contact conductance, interference fit, fin spacing, fin thickness, tube diameter, heat transfer, vacuum chamber testing, empirical correlations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review