Cited by 610Heat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer MechanismsHeat transfer and supercritical fluids

Heat transfer and pressure drop correlations for the rectangular offset strip fin compact heat exchanger

Manglik, Raj M., Bergles, Arthur E.·1995·Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0894-1777(94)00096-q

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Manglik, R. M., & Bergles, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Manglik, Raj M.
Venue
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-02
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
171-180
ISSN
0894-1777 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983191702
Cited by
610
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
Keywords
compact heat exchangers, heat transfer correlations, pressure drop correlations, friction factor, Nusselt number, thermal-hydraulic design, laminar flow, turbulent flow, flow regime transition, power-law correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review