The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT
Open accessAbstract
Kappa is frequently used in epidemiology as an index of the quality of measurement for binary characteristics. The authors discuss the strong dependence of kappa on true prevalence, and they examine the relationship of the value of kappa to the degree of attenuation of the odds ratio that results from non-differential misclassification. It is concluded that under certain circumstances kappa can be interpreted as an indicator of validity, i.e. unbiasedness of the odds ratio, rather than simply as one of reliability. Cautions are stressed regarding (1) possible variation in the quality of measurement and (2) possible lack of independence of errors for the paired measurements from which kappa is calculated. An important implication for the design of reliability studies is that they should be conducted in populations where the distribution of the factor of interest is similar to that for the settings in which the measurement technique will ultimately be applied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic
MACLURE, M., & WILLETT, W. C. (1987) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/126.2.161 · Cited by 808
THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE PRESENCE OF COVARIATES
GREENLAND, S. (1980) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113025 · Cited by 494
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Carey, 1978, Reliability and validity in binary ratings: Areas of common misunderstanding in diagnosis and symptom ratings, Arch Gen Psychiat, 35, 1454, 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770360058007 · DOI
- Grove, 1981, Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis: Theory and practice, Arch Gen Psychiat, 38, 408, 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290042004 · DOI · Paper page
- Leckman, 1982, Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: A methodologic study, Arch Gen Psychiat, 39, 879, 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290080001001 · DOI · Paper page
- Spitznagel, 1985, A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic, Arch Gen Psychiat, 42, 725, 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790300093012 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen, 1960, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educ Psychol Meas, 20, 37, 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
- Kraemer, 1979, Ramifications of a population model for κ as a coefficient of reliability, Psychometrika, 44, 461, 10.1007/BF02296208 · DOI · Paper page
- Shrout, 1987, Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited, Arch Gen Psychiat, 44, 172, 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800140084013 · DOI · Paper page
- Copeland, 1977, Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk, Am J Epidemiol, 105, 488, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112408 · DOI · Paper page
- Walter, 1984, Commentary on “Use of dual responses to increase validity of case-control studies”, J Chron Dis, 37, 137, 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90055-9 · DOI
- Curb, 1983, Nosological coding of cause of death, Am J Epidemiol, 118, 122, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113613 · DOI
- Feinstein, 1985, A bibliography of publications on observer variability, J Chron Dis, 38, 619, 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90016-5 · DOI
Cited by
The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements
Sim, J., & Wright, C. C. (2005) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/85.3.257 · Cited by 4,093
High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes
Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l · Cited by 3,034
Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data
Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, G., & Gu, Y. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2329330 · Cited by 2,679
Byrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J. B. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v · Cited by 2,179
Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.
Brennan, P., & Silman, A. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491 · Cited by 985
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, W. D., & Walter, S. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 949-958
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966184253
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor, 6385 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90031-5
- The paper
- Thompson, W. D., & Walter, S. D. (1988). A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90031-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.