Cited by 295Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports and Physical Education Studies

Accuracy of the College Alumnus Physical Activity Questionnaire

Ainsworth, Barbara E., Leon, Arthur S., Richardson, Mark T., Jacobs, David R., Paffenbarger, R.S.·1993·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

The validity and reproducibility of the Physical Activity Index from the College Alumnus Questionnaire (PAI-CAQ) were determined in 78 men and women (21-59 yr) with a broad range of physical activity habits. The PAI-CAQ was computed as the sum of energy expended in stair climbing, walking, and sports and recreational physical activity recalled from the past week. Data were validated against measures of cardiorespiratory fitness, body fatness, motion detection, and physical activity records. All physical activity was recorded by participants for six 48-hour periods. Each day of the week, including weekends, were represented at least twice in the physical activity records. Age-adjusted correlation coefficients between like activities on the College Alumnus Questionnaire and physical activity records ranged from 0.25 to 0.65 in men and 0.28 to 0.86 in women. Correlations between the PAI-CAQ and validation criteria that reflected total and heavy-intensity physical activities were higher (r = 0.34-0.69, p < 0.05) than for lighter-intensity physical activities and motion detection expressed in MET-min.d-1 and kcal.d-1 (r < 0.35, p > 0.05). Test-retest reproducibility was higher over 1 month (r = 0.72) than over 8 and 9 months (r = 0.34 and 0.43) (p < 0.05). Energy expended in walking and stair climbing was underestimated on the College Alumnus Questionnaire, resulting in lower PAI-CAQ scores, as compared to the physical activity records.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90140-v

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire has high reliability and convergent validity with several objective measures of physical activity and fitness, including maximal oxygen uptake and body mass index.

    “This instrument has high reliability (33) and convergent validity with several objective measures of physical activity and fitness, including maximal oxygen uptake (34) and body mass index (BMI) (35).”

    From Social jetlag, chronotype, and cardiometabolic risk (2015) · cites this paper as [33]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 295

Authors
Ainsworth, B. E., Leon, A. S., Richardson, M. T., Jacobs, D. R., & Paffenbarger, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Ainsworth, Barbara E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-12
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
1403-1411
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107830557
Cited by
295
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01-HL 37354)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
physical activity index, physical activity measurement, questionnaire validity, reproducibility, test-retest reliability, energy expenditure, stair climbing, walking, cardiorespiratory fitness, adiposity, motion detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Universities, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review