Cited by 62Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Does mood-congruence or causal search govern recall bias? a test of life event recall

Raphael, Karen G., Cloitre, Marylene·1994·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Recall bias has been hypothesized to occur as a function of mood congruence or causal-search related mechanisms. This study tested whether either mechanism related to recall of stressful life events over a year. Respondents consisted of 136 cases suffering from chronic facial pain and 131 acquaintance controls. After reporting life events for 1 year at monthly intervals, respondents attempted to recall these same events at year-end. Mood and likelihood of engaging in causal search were also ascertained at year-end. Results showed no effect of mood congruence or causal search on recall of event occurrence. However, mood did influence subjective appraisal of those events that were recalled. In addition, a significant mood-related memory deficit was detected. Findings indicate that mood-related memory deficit may reduce effect sizes artifactually. Furthermore, when assessing effects of recall bias, recall of event occurrence must be considered separately from subjective appraisal of event characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90302-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problems of interpretation remain for questionnaire or interview-based assessments of stressful life events, including accurate timing of events and memory biases and/or forgetting.

    “Furthermore, problems of interpretation remain including accurate timing of events and memory biases and/or forgetting (Brown et al., 1973; Raphael & Cloitre, 1994; Raphael, Cloitre, & Dohrenwend, 1991), which would not impact on SLEs that were assessed from objective sources.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raphael, K. G., & Cloitre, M.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-05
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
555-564
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032364546
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03mh048454-01a1, 5r01de005989-08)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH48454)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 05989)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
recall bias, mood congruence, life events, chronic facial pain
MeSH terms
Affect, Life Change Events, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review