The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing medication adherence by pill count and electronic monitoring in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and hypertension (AASK) pilot study
Open accessAbstract
The Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), an electronic monitor which records the date and time of bottle cap openings, and pill counts were used to assess patterns of adherence for the primary antihypertensive drug in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Pilot Study (AASK). Blacks with hypertension and moderately reduced renal function were randomized to one of two levels of blood pressure control and to one of three antihypertensive drug regimens: primary therapy with a calcium channel blocker, an angiotension converting enzyme inhibitor, or a beta-blocker. Of the 94 participants in AASK, 91 had MEMS recordings and pill counts for 313 regularly scheduled monthly follow-up visits. The average length of follow-up was 4.6 months. An acceptable level of adherence by pill count was achieved if 80% to 100% of the prescribed pills were not returned to the clinic. Adherence by MEMS to a once-a-day drug dosing schedule was acceptable if 80% of the time intervals between MEMS openings were within 24 +/- 6 h. Acceptable adherence by pill count was observed at 68% of the follow-up visits; MEMS indicated nonadherence at 47% of those visits. Blood pressure was within goal in 50% of the participants who were adherent by both pill count and MEMS throughout their follow-up visits, and only 14% of the participants who were identified nonadherent by one or both methods. These findings suggest that electronic monitoring is a useful adjunct to pill counts in assessing adherence to antihypertensive drugs. Feedback of electronically collected information on dosing intervals to participants and staff may enhance adherence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance
Claxton, A. J., Cramer, J., & Pierce, C. (2001) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80109-0 · Cited by 2,388
Medication adherence measures: An overview
Lam, W. Y., & Fresco, P. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/217047 · Cited by 1,308
Kato, P. M., Cole, S. W., Bradlyn, A. S., & Pollock, B. H. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3134 · Cited by 802
(2009) · PubMed · Cited by 359
Resistant Hypertension: A Review of Diagnosis and Management
Vongpatanasin, W. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.5180 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Hypertension
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 719-725
- ISSN
- 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063396650
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing medication adherence by pill count and electronic monitoring in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and hypertension (AASK) pilot study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0895-7061(96)00056-8
- The paper
- Lee, J. (1996). Assessing medication adherence by pill count and electronic monitoring in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and hypertension (AASK) pilot study. American Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7061(96)00056-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.