Cited by 322Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsTreatment of Major Depression

Postsynaptic factors control the duration of synaptic enhancement in area CA1 of the hippocampus

Malenka, Robert C.·1991·Neuron

Abstract

In area of CA1 of the hippocampus, at least two phases of long-term potentiation (LTP) can be isolated: an early decremental component referred to as short-term potentiation (STP), which precedes a long-lasting, nondecremental component commonly considered to be stable LTP. Utilizing the hippocampal slice preparation, experiments were performed to determine the physiological factors controlling the conversion of STP to LTP. The duration of NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic enhancement was influenced by several factors, including the degree of postsynaptic NMDA receptor activation and the magnitude and timing of postsynaptic membrane depolarization during synaptic transmission. It was possible to convert STP to LTP by manipulations that increased the influx of calcium into the postsynaptic cell. These results demonstrate that NMDA receptor activation can result in distinct forms of synaptic potentiation and imply that the magnitude of postsynaptic calcium increase is a critical variable controlling the duration of synaptic enhancement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90121-f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weak repetitive synaptic stimulation can elicit an NMDA-dependent decaying potentiation referred to as short-term potentiation (STP).

    “For instance, weak repetitive synaptic stimulation can elicit an NMDA-dependent decaying potentiation referred to as short-term potentiation (STP) (99–101).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [101]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 322

Authors
Malenka, R. C.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Malenka, Robert C.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
53-60
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004692311
Cited by
322
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29mh045334-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH45334)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
long-term potentiation, short-term potentiation, NMDA receptor, hippocampal CA1, synaptic plasticity, LTP induction
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Kinetics, Synapses, Second Messenger Systems, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate, Neurotransmitter Agents, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review