The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling the basic error tendencies of human operators
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In process control, operators have a distinct preference for surface control rather than deep control of the system.
“While this surface/deep control distinction is best thought of as a continuum, studies of process control environments have often indicated that operators have a distinct preference for surface control rather than deep control of the system (e.g., [81, 92]).”
From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Norman, 1979, Descriptions: an intermediate stage in memory retrieval, Cognitive Psychology, 11, 107, 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90006-9 · DOI
- Hasher, 1984, Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence, American Psychologist, 39, 1372, 10.1037/0003-066X.39.12.1372 · DOI
- Reason, 1986, Recurrent errors in process environments: some implications for the design of intelligent decision support systems, Vol. F21
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.156574 · Cited by 1,084
Cacciabue, P. C., Decortis, F., Drozdowicz, B., Masson, M., & Nordvik, J.-P. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.179844 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Reason, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reason, James
- Venue
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 137-153
- ISSN
- 0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057403243
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- operator error, human cognition, knowledge base, similarity matching, pattern matching, confirmation bias, similarity bias, frequency bias, parallel distributed processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
