Task dependent tools for intelligent automation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automating administrative tasks is a key aspect of efficient system management in Unix and Linux systems.
“In Unix and Linux systems, automating administrative tasks is a key aspect of efficient system management (Leitch and Stefanini 1989).”
From Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security (2025) · cites this paper as Leitch and Stefanini 1989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security
Madamanchi, S. R. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.72773 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leitch, R., & Stefanini, A.
- Affiliations
- Heriot-Watt University (GB)
- ORCID
- Stefanini, Alberto
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 126-143
- ISSN
- 0954-1810 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975031223
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence in Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Keywords
- expert systems, intelligent automation, industrial automation, qualitative modeling, inference mechanisms, truth maintenance, causal order, constraint propagation, task classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
