The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Cited by
Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538 · Cited by 1,331
Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305016 · Cited by 1,293
Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust
Chi, M. T. H. (2005) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1 · Cited by 894
Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications
BRANSFORD, J. D., & SCHWARTZ, D. L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x024001061 · Cited by 881
Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding
Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3 · Cited by 757
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-43
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969288146
- Cited by
- 990
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 83.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
