Seasonal amount, growth and depth distribution of fine roots in an irrigated and fertilized Salix viminalis L. plantation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Values for fine roots from willow and poplar grown as short-rotation forestry are lower than for short-rotation coppice.
“Several authors investigated fine roots from willow and poplar grown as SRC [5, 30, 81, 82, 88, 89] and SRF [72, 90–93], values for the latter being lower (Table 1).”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Rytter, R.-M., & Hansson, A.-C.
- Affiliations
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- ORCID
- Rytter, Rose-Marie
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 129-137
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084882328
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- fine roots, Salix viminalis, willow plantations, short rotation forestry, root depth distribution, root biomass, root length, minirhizotron, soil coring, irrigation, fertilization, heavy clay soil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
