Assessment of biodegradability of plastics under simulated composting conditions in a laboratory test system
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mineralization rates of polyesters in aerobic tests decreased as PHAs > PCL > PLA.
“The mineralization of polyesters has been evaluated using soil (i.e.compost) or diluting the inoculum in growing medium enriched with minerals and the rates decreased as follows: PHAs > PCL > PLA.[481][482][483][484]”
From Catalysis as an Enabling Science for Sustainable Polymers (2018) · cites this paper as [482]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Starnecker, A., & Menner, M.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (DE)
- Venue
- International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 85-92
- ISSN
- 0964-8305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024245551
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation (publishedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Keywords
- biodegradable plastics, aerobic biodegradation, laboratory test system, oxygen consumption, carbon mass balance, compost, temperature profiles, biodegradation rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
