Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seasonal and interannual variability in primary production and particle flux at Station ALOHA

Karl, D.M., Christian, J.R., Dore, J.E., Hebel, D.V., Letelier, R.M., Tupas, L.M., Winn, C.D.·1996·Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography

Abstract

A 5-year time-series study of primary production and euphotic-zone particle export in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean near Hawaii (Sta. ALOHA, 22°45′N, 158°W) with measurements collected at approximately monthly intervals has revealed significant variability in both ecosystem processes. Depth-integrated (0–200 m) primary production averaged 463 mg C m−2 day−1 (s = 156, n = 54) or 14.1 mol C m−2 year−1. This mean value is greater than estimates for the North Pacific Ocean gyre made prior to 1984, but conforms to data obtained since the advent of trace metal-clean techniques. Daily rates of primary productivity at Sta. ALOHA exhibited interannual variability including a nearly 3-year sustained increase during the period 1990–1992 that coincided with a prolonged El Nifio-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) event. Export production, defined as the particulate carbon (PC) flux measured at the 150 m reference depth, also varied considerably during the initial 5 years of the ongoing field experiment. The PC flux averaged 29 mg C m−2 day−1 (s = 11, n = 43) or 0.88 mol Cm−2 year−1. A 5-fold variation between the minimum and maximum fluxes, measured in any given year, was observed. During the first 3 years of this program (1989–1991), a pattern was resolved that included two major export events per annum one centered in late winter and the other in late summer. After 1991, export production exhibited a systematic decrease with time during the prolonged ENSO event. When expressed as a percentage of the contemporaneous primary production, PC export ranged from 2 to 16.9%, with a 5-year mean of 6.7% (s = 3.3, n = 40). Contrary to existing empirical models, contemporaneous primary production and PC flux were poorly correlated, and during the ENSO period they exhibited a significant inverse correlation. This unexpected decoupling of particle production and flux has numerous implications for oceanic biogeochemical cycles and for the response of the ocean to environmental perturbations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0967-0645(96)00002-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Karl, D. M., Christian, J. R., Dore, J. E., Hebel, D. V., Letelier, R. M., Tupas, L. M., & Winn, C. D.
Venue
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
43
Issue
2-3
Pages
539-568
ISSN
0967-0645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994805030
Cited by
439
References
0
FWCI
15.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seasonal and interannual variability in primary production and particle flux at Station ALOHA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0967-0645(96)00002-1
The paper
Karl, D. M., Christian, J. R., Dore, J. E., Hebel, D. V., Letelier, R. M., Tupas, L. M., & Winn, C. D. (1996). Seasonal and interannual variability in primary production and particle flux at Station ALOHA. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(96)00002-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.